33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.94%
Similar revenue growth to BRZE's 7.41%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
6.91%
Cost increase while BRZE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
6.95%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of BRZE's 12.28%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
0.01%
Margin expansion below 50% of BRZE's 4.54%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.80%
R&D growth while BRZE reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-1.09%
G&A reduction while BRZE shows 5.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
2.75%
Marketing expense growth while BRZE reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.49%
Operating expenses growth while BRZE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.37%
Total costs growth while BRZE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-85.57%
D&A reduction while BRZE shows 18.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-125.02%
EBITDA decline while BRZE shows 34.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-110.42%
EBITDA margin decline while BRZE shows 37.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
11.82%
Operating income growth below 50% of BRZE's 30.26%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
17.54%
Operating margin growth 50-75% of BRZE's 35.08%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-4.54%
Other expenses reduction while BRZE shows 6.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
13.14%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of BRZE's 35.70%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
18.77%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of BRZE's 40.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
177.13%
Tax expense growth while BRZE reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
11.87%
Net income growth below 50% of BRZE's 35.47%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
17.58%
Net margin growth below 50% of BRZE's 39.92%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.40%
EPS growth below 50% of BRZE's 34.29%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.40%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of BRZE's 34.29%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.96%
Share count reduction below 50% of BRZE's 0.66%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.96%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of BRZE's 0.66%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.