PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
7.31%
Revenue growth below 50% of FLNC's 71.21%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
2.27%
Cost growth less than half of FLNC's 70.64%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
9.29%
Gross profit growth below 50% of FLNC's 76.39%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.84%
Margin expansion 50-75% of FLNC's 3.02%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
5.97%
R&D growth less than half of FLNC's 12.87%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
11.56%
G&A growth 50-75% of FLNC's 16.80%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine operational efficiency.
-0.88%
Marketing expense reduction while FLNC shows 47.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.40%
Operating expenses growth less than half of FLNC's 16.47%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
3.17%
Total costs growth less than half of FLNC's 61.51%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.46%
D&A growth while FLNC reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
8.70%
EBITDA growth below 50% of FLNC's 51.64%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.92%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of FLNC's 71.75%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.01%
Operating income growth below 50% of FLNC's 52.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.27%
Operating margin growth below 50% of FLNC's 72.15%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.90%
Other expenses growth while FLNC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
11.05%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of FLNC's 45.72%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
17.11%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of FLNC's 68.30%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-53.18%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
11.62%
Net income growth below 50% of FLNC's 45.24%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
17.65%
Net margin growth below 50% of FLNC's 68.01%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
15.38%
EPS growth below 50% of FLNC's 48.36%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
15.38%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of FLNC's 48.36%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.02%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x FLNC's 4.73%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
1.02%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x FLNC's 4.73%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.