PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
16.31%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x GTLB's 9.43%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
12.08%
Cost growth above 1.5x GTLB's 6.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
17.79%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x GTLB's 9.81%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1.27%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x GTLB's 0.35%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
20.73%
R&D growth above 1.5x GTLB's 6.79%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
14.07%
G&A growth above 1.5x GTLB's 1.82%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
13.89%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x GTLB's 4.35%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.77%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x GTLB's 3.38%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
14.98%
Total costs growth above 1.5x GTLB's 3.59%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
212.02%
Interest expense change of 212.02% while GTLB maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
803.92%
D&A growth while GTLB reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.34%
EBITDA growth 50-75% of GTLB's 14.79%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
22.06%
Similar EBITDA margin growth to GTLB's 25.67%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
0.79%
Operating income growth below 50% of GTLB's 18.10%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.70%
Operating margin growth 50-75% of GTLB's 25.16%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
22.32%
Other expenses growth while GTLB reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-145.72%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-111.27%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1195.77%
Tax expense growth while GTLB reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-149.00%
Net income decline while GTLB shows 87.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-114.08%
Net margin decline while GTLB shows 88.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-147.93%
EPS decline while GTLB shows 87.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-147.93%
Diluted EPS decline while GTLB shows 87.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.08%
Share count reduction below 50% of GTLB's 0.95%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
1.08%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of GTLB's 0.95%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.