PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.61%
Revenue growth below 50% of GTLB's 3.30%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-0.58%
Cost reduction while GTLB shows 17.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
2.34%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x GTLB's 1.77%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
0.72%
Margin expansion while GTLB shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.62%
R&D reduction while GTLB shows 3.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
4.59%
G&A growth less than half of GTLB's 45.45%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
10.85%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x GTLB's 1.83%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.31%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of GTLB's 12.32%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
4.87%
Total costs growth less than half of GTLB's 12.74%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-2.57%
D&A reduction while GTLB shows 29.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
52.06%
EBITDA growth while GTLB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
52.82%
EBITDA margin growth while GTLB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-21.46%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-19.53%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.09%
Other expenses reduction while GTLB shows 1344.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
49.87%
Pre-tax income growth while GTLB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
50.66%
Pre-tax margin growth while GTLB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-79.57%
Tax expense reduction while GTLB shows 619.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
50.35%
Net income growth while GTLB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
51.14%
Net margin growth while GTLB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
52.38%
EPS growth while GTLB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
52.38%
Diluted EPS growth while GTLB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.99%
Share count reduction below 50% of GTLB's 0.99%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.99%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of GTLB's 0.99%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.