PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
15.54%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x TOST's 4.49%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
20.86%
Cost growth above 1.5x TOST's 1.59%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
13.47%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of TOST's 21.92%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
-1.78%
Margin decline while TOST shows 16.68% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
16.60%
R&D growth 50-75% of TOST's 24.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
4.01%
G&A growth while TOST reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
13.88%
Similar marketing expense growth to TOST's 18.33%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry requirements.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.87%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x TOST's 0.53%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
13.58%
Total costs growth above 1.5x TOST's 1.27%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.37%
D&A growth less than half of TOST's 20.00%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-9.81%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.95%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of TOST's 16.48%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-9.37%
Operating income decline while TOST shows 12.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
5.33%
Operating margin growth below 50% of TOST's 16.67%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
118.39%
Other expenses growth while TOST reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-6.30%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
7.99%
Pre-tax margin growth while TOST declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-6.24%
Net income decline while TOST shows 2650.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
8.05%
Net margin growth below 50% of TOST's 2531.78%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-6.25%
EPS decline while TOST shows 2650.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.25%
Diluted EPS decline while TOST shows 147.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.