PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
7.63%
Revenue growth below 50% of TOST's 19.41%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
11.71%
Cost growth 50-75% of TOST's 19.38%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
6.06%
Gross profit growth below 50% of TOST's 19.54%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.46%
Margin decline while TOST shows 0.11% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
2.10%
R&D growth less than half of TOST's 8.24%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
-5.45%
G&A reduction while TOST shows 17.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
5.02%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x TOST's 1.01%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.67%
Operating expenses growth less than half of TOST's 8.27%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
3.55%
Total costs growth less than half of TOST's 16.14%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
2468.33%
Interest expense growth while TOST reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-83.55%
D&A reduction while TOST shows 33.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
3.95%
EBITDA growth below 50% of TOST's 16.28%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.76%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of TOST's 56.72%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.87%
Operating income growth below 50% of TOST's 13.04%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
11.61%
Operating margin growth below 50% of TOST's 27.18%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2668.33%
Other expenses growth while TOST reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
8.57%
Pre-tax income growth while TOST declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
15.05%
Pre-tax margin growth while TOST declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-94.47%
Tax expense reduction while TOST shows 105.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
9.45%
Net income growth while TOST declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
15.86%
Net margin growth while TOST declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.14%
EPS growth while TOST declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.14%
Diluted EPS growth while TOST declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.88%
Share count reduction below 50% of TOST's 0.98%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.88%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of TOST's 0.98%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.