33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
9.51%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x TOST's 3.76%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
11.70%
Cost growth above 1.5x TOST's 1.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
8.67%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of TOST's 11.66%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
-0.76%
Margin decline while TOST shows 7.61% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
10.55%
R&D growth while TOST reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-0.96%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
22.95%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x TOST's 4.90%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.12%
Operating expenses growth while TOST reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
13.62%
Total costs growth while TOST reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.93%
D&A growth less than half of TOST's 10.00%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-27.87%
EBITDA decline while TOST shows 91.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.76%
EBITDA margin decline while TOST shows 252.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-26.39%
Operating income decline while TOST shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.41%
Operating margin decline while TOST shows 3.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.33%
Other expenses growth while TOST reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-30.05%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.75%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-56.52%
Tax expense reduction while TOST shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-26.60%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.61%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-30.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-30.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.94%
Share count reduction below 50% of TOST's 1.11%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.94%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of TOST's 1.11%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
