33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
16.31%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x TOST's 2.53%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
12.08%
Cost growth above 1.5x TOST's 2.24%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
17.79%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x TOST's 3.42%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1.27%
Margin expansion 1.25-1.5x TOST's 0.87%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
20.73%
R&D growth above 1.5x TOST's 4.49%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
14.07%
G&A growth while TOST reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
13.89%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x TOST's 9.24%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.77%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x TOST's 4.51%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
14.98%
Total costs growth above 1.5x TOST's 6.22%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
212.02%
Interest expense change of 212.02% while TOST maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
803.92%
D&A change of 803.92% while TOST maintains D&A. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
9.34%
EBITDA growth below 50% of TOST's 26.47%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
22.06%
Similar EBITDA margin growth to TOST's 23.35%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
0.79%
Operating income growth while TOST declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.70%
Operating margin growth while TOST declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
22.32%
Other expenses growth while TOST reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-145.72%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-111.27%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1195.77%
Tax expense growth while TOST reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-149.00%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-114.08%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-147.93%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-147.93%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.08%
Share count reduction below 50% of TOST's 1.07%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
1.08%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of TOST's 1.69%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
