PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
7.25%
Revenue growth below 50% of TOST's 15.93%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
3.63%
Cost growth less than half of TOST's 16.85%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
8.43%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of TOST's 13.29%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
1.09%
Margin expansion while TOST shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.67%
R&D growth less than half of TOST's 8.33%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
9.81%
G&A change of 9.81% while TOST maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-0.94%
Marketing expense reduction while TOST shows 6.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.91%
Similar operating expenses growth to TOST's 2.97%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
3.06%
Total costs growth less than half of TOST's 13.60%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
45.85%
D&A growth while TOST reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
30.91%
Similar EBITDA growth to TOST's 40.58%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
35.59%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x TOST's 21.26%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
18.60%
Operating income growth below 50% of TOST's 86.05%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
24.11%
Operating margin growth below 50% of TOST's 60.48%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.48%
Other expenses growth while TOST reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
23.17%
Pre-tax income growth 50-75% of TOST's 43.10%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
28.37%
Pre-tax margin growth 1.25-1.5x TOST's 23.44%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-52.69%
Tax expense reduction while TOST shows 50.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
23.79%
Net income growth 50-75% of TOST's 42.86%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
28.95%
Net margin growth 1.25-1.5x TOST's 23.23%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
312.05%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x TOST's 47.37%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
312.05%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x TOST's 47.90%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.92%
Share count reduction below 50% of TOST's 0.87%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.92%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of TOST's 0.33%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.