33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.95%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.50%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate if growth quality matches quantity.
3.57%
Cost growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.01%. Jim Chanos would check for structural cost disadvantages.
6.67%
Positive growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch would examine competitive advantages.
0.68%
Margin expansion while Technology median declines. Peter Lynch would examine competitive advantages.
13.60%
R&D growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.25%. Jim Chanos would check for wasteful spending.
19.46%
G&A growth while Technology reduces overhead. Peter Lynch would examine operational differences.
8.35%
Marketing expense change of 8.35% versus flat Technology spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
11.45%
Operating expenses growth while Technology reduces costs. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
10.10%
Total costs growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.88%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.04%
D&A growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.59%. Jim Chanos would check for overinvestment.
-127.84%
EBITDA decline while Technology median is -33.49%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-115.05%
EBITDA margin decline while Technology median is -41.83%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-80.62%
Operating income decline while Technology median is -13.99%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-70.48%
Operating margin decline while Technology median is -16.89%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
29.93%
Other expenses growth while Technology reduces costs. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
-138.19%
Pre-tax income decline while Technology median is -16.90%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-124.82%
Pre-tax margin decline while Technology median is -25.88%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-38.46%
Tax expense reduction while Technology median is 34.62%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-97.47%
Net income decline while Technology median is -21.34%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-86.39%
Net margin decline while Technology median is -24.25%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-101.01%
EPS decline while Technology median is -27.46%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-101.01%
Diluted EPS decline while Technology median is -28.79%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
0.72%
Share count reduction below 50% of Technology median of 0.12%. Jim Chanos would check for issues.
0.72%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of Technology median of 0.24%. Jim Chanos would check for issues.