33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-6.74%
Negative ROE while DAVA stands at 2.94%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-4.20%
Negative ROA while DAVA stands at 2.12%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
-5.54%
Negative ROCE while DAVA is at 10.83%. Joel Greenblatt would look for capital misallocation or cyclical downturn.
71.17%
Gross margin above 1.5x DAVA's 35.32%. David Dodd would assess whether superior technology or brand is driving this.
-42.85%
Negative operating margin while DAVA has 30.46%. Joel Greenblatt would demand urgent improvements in cost or revenue.
-41.87%
Negative net margin while DAVA has 7.32%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.