33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-6.74%
Negative ROE while PAGS stands at 3.09%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-4.20%
Negative ROA while PAGS stands at 0.90%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
-5.54%
Negative ROCE while PAGS is at 7.77%. Joel Greenblatt would look for capital misallocation or cyclical downturn.
71.17%
Gross margin 1.25-1.5x PAGS's 48.79%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if this advantage is sustainable.
-42.85%
Negative operating margin while PAGS has 34.83%. Joel Greenblatt would demand urgent improvements in cost or revenue.
-41.87%
Negative net margin while PAGS has 10.24%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.