33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-1.05%
Negative ROE while PATH stands at 2.81%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-0.55%
Negative ROA while PATH stands at 1.81%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
-1.46%
Negative ROCE while PATH is at 1.63%. Joel Greenblatt would look for capital misallocation or cyclical downturn.
76.81%
Similar gross margin to PATH's 84.77%. Walter Schloss would check if both companies have comparable cost structures.
-5.32%
Negative operating margin while PATH has 7.93%. Joel Greenblatt would demand urgent improvements in cost or revenue.
-3.23%
Negative net margin while PATH has 12.23%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.