33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-39.73
Negative P/E while PAGS shows 40.02. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability versus competitor.
75.72
P/S above 1.5x PAGS's 15.11. Michael Burry would check for mean reversion risks.
-10.79
Negative equity while PAGS shows P/B of 4.58. Joel Greenblatt would examine balance sheet repair potential.
-158.53
Both companies show negative FCF. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide capital intensity issues.
-171.51
Negative operating cash flow while PAGS shows P/OCF of 589.08. Joel Greenblatt would examine operational improvement potential.
-10.79
Negative fair value while PAGS shows ratio of 4.58. Joel Greenblatt would examine valuation model differences.
-0.63%
Negative earnings while PAGS shows yield of 0.62%. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability.
-0.63%
Both companies show negative FCF. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide capital intensity issues.