743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
29.08%
Cash & equivalents growing 29.08% while PINS's declined -2.82%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
1.46%
Short-term investments yoy growth below half of PINS's 5.83%. Michael Burry might see potential liquidity risk. Investigate alternative capital uses or constraints.
8.23%
Cash + STI yoy ≥ 1.5x PINS's 1.69%. David Dodd might see it as a strategic cash buffer advantage. Evaluate deployment plans.
18.66%
Receivables growth above 1.5x PINS's 7.06%. Michael Burry would check for potential credit bubble or inflated top-line.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.43%
Similar yoy growth to PINS's 3.41%. Walter Schloss notes comparable short-term expansions. Investigate quality of these assets.
1.74%
Below half PINS's -2.30%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
16.51%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to PINS's zero value, indicating worse performance.
2.60%
Less than half of PINS's -1.51%. David Dodd sees relatively fewer intangible expansions. Possibly more tangible-driven.
8.66%
Less than half of PINS's -1.51%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.05%
Less than half of PINS's 17.41%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
4.42%
≥ 1.5x PINS's 0.22%. David Dodd sees significantly higher long-term asset buildup. Confirm synergy with strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.70%
≥ 1.5x PINS's 2.28%. David Dodd notes a larger balance sheet expansion. Confirm it's not overleveraged.
-26.67%
Above 1.5x PINS's -4.99%. Michael Burry questions if payables are being stretched to avoid short-term borrowing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-98.36%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to PINS's zero value, indicating worse performance.
6.67%
Higher Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth compared to PINS's zero value, indicating better performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.60%
Less than half of PINS's -0.64%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
23.40%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to PINS's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-73.88%
Less than half of PINS's 12.96%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
0.83%
Less than half of PINS's -0.32%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.08%
Less than half of PINS's -0.54%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.73%
1.25-1.5x PINS's 13.88%. Bruce Berkowitz notes stronger reinvestment strategy.
-93.33%
Less than half of PINS's 152.15%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.44%
≥ 1.5x PINS's 2.63%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
3.70%
≥ 1.5x PINS's 2.28%. David Dodd sees faster overall balance sheet growth than competitor.
1.46%
Below half PINS's 5.83%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-4.03%
Similar yoy changes to PINS's -4.55%. Walter Schloss notes parallel total debt strategies.
-1144.78%
Less than half of PINS's 2.60%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
