743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-44.80%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-44.80% vs PINS's -24.42%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
18.30%
Similar yoy growth to PINS's 18.69%. Walter Schloss would note comparable strategies in building short-term reserves.
-4.50%
Cash + STI yoy 1.25-1.5x PINS's -3.17%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if the firm is preparing for expansions or simply hoarding.
7.23%
Receivables growth less than half of PINS's 61.61%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.42%
Below half of PINS's 3.82%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
6.80%
Below half PINS's -2.88%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
0.01%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to PINS's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-13.39%
Above 1.5x PINS's -1.80%. Michael Burry might suspect inflated intangible valuations or questionable M&A additions.
-0.57%
Less than half of PINS's -1.80%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.31%
Less than half of PINS's -54.65%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
12.68%
Below half of PINS's -8.00%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.83%
≥ 1.5x PINS's 2.29%. David Dodd notes a larger balance sheet expansion. Confirm it's not overleveraged.
20.22%
Less than half of PINS's -4.58%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
43.56%
Higher Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth compared to PINS's zero value, indicating better performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.62%
Less than half of PINS's 13.82%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.24%
Less than half of PINS's 2.10%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-6.55%
Less than half of PINS's 0.23%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.84%
Less than half of PINS's 6.83%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.12%
Below half PINS's -3.85%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
316.90%
Less than half of PINS's -44.80%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.60%
≥ 1.5x PINS's 1.47%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
4.83%
≥ 1.5x PINS's 2.29%. David Dodd sees faster overall balance sheet growth than competitor.
34.88%
≥ 1.5x PINS's 18.69%. David Dodd sees far stronger investment expansions than competitor.
0.80%
Less than half of PINS's -0.74%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
90.48%
Above 1.5x PINS's 29.45%. Michael Burry sees a major gap in net debt growth. Check coverage and liquidity.
