743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-17.05%
Cash & equivalents declining -17.05% while PINS's grows 10.86%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
7.13%
Short-term investments yoy growth ≥ 1.5x PINS's 0.93%. David Dodd would see a more robust near-cash position, but confirm efficient allocation.
-0.22%
Below half of PINS's 5.39%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
13.84%
Receivables growth 50-75% of PINS's 20.29%. Bruce Berkowitz would note relatively tighter receivables. Check if sales remain robust.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.36%
0.5-0.75x PINS's 8.41%. Martin Whitman might see risk if this hampers near-term financial flexibility.
6.06%
Below half PINS's -6.47%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
0.86%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to PINS's zero value, indicating worse performance.
1.78%
Less than half of PINS's 4.00%. David Dodd sees relatively fewer intangible expansions. Possibly more tangible-driven.
0.88%
Less than half of PINS's 4.00%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
0.80%
Below half of PINS's -3.28%. Michael Burry sees possible underinvestment in long-term assets. Verify capital constraints.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.01%
Less than half of PINS's 4.30%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
4.31%
Below half of PINS's -5.61%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.33%
0.5-0.75x PINS's 7.18%. Martin Whitman worries about slower asset growth than competitor. Is it strategy or constraint?
10.82%
Less than half of PINS's -1.13%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.36%
Higher Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth compared to PINS's zero value, indicating better performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.96%
1.1-1.25x PINS's 13.61%. Bill Ackman questions if the firm is taking on more near-term obligations than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.35%
Less than half of PINS's 5.40%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
2.09%
Less than half of PINS's -6.60%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.42%
Above 1.5x PINS's 5.02%. Michael Burry sees a potential leverage warning sign.
3.29%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to PINS's zero value, indicating worse performance.
3.34%
1.25-1.5x PINS's 2.95%. Bruce Berkowitz notes stronger reinvestment strategy.
85.06%
Less than half of PINS's -12.57%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.42%
Below half PINS's 7.52%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
4.33%
0.5-0.75x PINS's 7.18%. Martin Whitman sees underexpansion or possible missed opportunities.
6.35%
≥ 1.5x PINS's 0.93%. David Dodd sees far stronger investment expansions than competitor.
3.38%
Less than half of PINS's -6.12%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
47.09%
Less than half of PINS's -13.66%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
