743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-0.76%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-0.76% vs PINS's -15.67%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
0.86%
Short-term investments yoy growth below half of PINS's 18.72%. Michael Burry might see potential liquidity risk. Investigate alternative capital uses or constraints.
-0.04%
Below half of PINS's -1.51%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
8.00%
Receivables growth less than half of PINS's 17.81%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.75%
Other current assets growth < half of PINS's 26.90%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
1.46%
0.5-0.75x PINS's 2.31%. Martin Whitman might see risk if this hampers near-term financial flexibility.
4.05%
≥ 1.5x PINS's 0.61%. David Dodd sees more aggressive capex. Confirm it's not overspending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.70%
Less than half of PINS's -1.59%. David Dodd sees relatively fewer intangible expansions. Possibly more tangible-driven.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.32%
Both PINS and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
18.70%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to PINS's zero value, indicating worse performance.
24.89%
Similar yoy growth to PINS's 29.01%. Walter Schloss sees parallel approach in non-core expansions.
4.27%
≥ 1.5x PINS's 0.72%. David Dodd sees significantly higher long-term asset buildup. Confirm synergy with strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.32%
≥ 1.5x PINS's 2.20%. David Dodd notes a larger balance sheet expansion. Confirm it's not overleveraged.
-16.17%
1.25-1.5x PINS's -11.63%. Martin Whitman sees potential reliance on supplier financing. Verify liquidity.
14.38%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to PINS's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-53.86%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to PINS's zero value, indicating worse performance.
1.31%
Higher Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth compared to PINS's zero value, indicating better performance.
24.27%
Higher Other Current Liabilities Growth compared to PINS's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-3.90%
Less than half of PINS's 8.19%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
0.01%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to PINS's zero value, indicating worse performance.
0.65%
Higher Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth compared to PINS's zero value, indicating better performance.
10.76%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to PINS's zero value, indicating worse performance.
12.32%
Less than half of PINS's -524.86%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
2.78%
Less than half of PINS's -0.67%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.22%
Less than half of PINS's 5.08%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
3.82%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to PINS's zero value, indicating worse performance.
5.72%
≥ 1.5x PINS's 0.41%. David Dodd sees higher yoy retained profits than competitor.
-1.51%
Less than half of PINS's 21.80%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.84%
≥ 1.5x PINS's 1.72%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
3.32%
≥ 1.5x PINS's 2.20%. David Dodd sees faster overall balance sheet growth than competitor.
0.60%
Below half PINS's 18.66%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
0.95%
Less than half of PINS's -1.68%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
11.52%
50-75% of PINS's 17.13%. Bruce Berkowitz notes comparatively lower net debt expansion.
