743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-20.88%
Cash & equivalents declining -20.88% while SNAP's grows 191.75%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
28.38%
Short-term investments yoy growth below half of SNAP's -31.29%. Michael Burry might see potential liquidity risk. Investigate alternative capital uses or constraints.
12.96%
Below half of SNAP's 129.17%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
19.29%
Higher Net Receivables Growth compared to SNAP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.43%
Below half of SNAP's 142.29%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
9.85%
Higher PP&E (Net) Growth compared to SNAP's zero value, indicating better performance.
0.08%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to SNAP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-6.13%
Higher Intangible Assets Growth compared to SNAP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-0.82%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to SNAP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.43%
Less than half of SNAP's 103.57%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
1.65%
Below half of SNAP's 154.88%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.04%
Higher Total Assets Growth compared to SNAP's zero value, indicating better performance.
-12.75%
Higher Accounts Payable Growth compared to SNAP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
43.64%
Higher Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth compared to SNAP's zero value, indicating better performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.22%
Higher Total Current Liabilities Growth compared to SNAP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.93%
Higher Other Non-Current Liabilities Growth compared to SNAP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
0.93%
Higher Total Non-Current Liabilities Growth compared to SNAP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.75%
Higher Total Liabilities Growth compared to SNAP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.19%
Higher Retained Earnings Growth compared to SNAP's zero value, indicating better performance.
-35.51%
Less than half of SNAP's -103.16%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.86%
Below half SNAP's 123.79%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
7.04%
Below half SNAP's 149.21%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
28.38%
Below half SNAP's -30.42%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.88%
Less than half of SNAP's -189.53%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
