743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-4.39%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-4.39% vs SNAP's -15.68%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
-3.50%
Short-term investments yoy growth below half of SNAP's -13.15%. Michael Burry might see potential liquidity risk. Investigate alternative capital uses or constraints.
-3.75%
Below half of SNAP's -13.80%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
9.29%
Receivables growth above 1.5x SNAP's 5.79%. Michael Burry would check for potential credit bubble or inflated top-line.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to SNAP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-1.15%
Below half of SNAP's -11.48%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
13.24%
Similar yoy growth to SNAP's 12.14%. Walter Schloss sees parallel capital spending strategies. Check utilization rates.
-0.03%
Less than half of SNAP's -1.58%. David Dodd might see less intangible risk, assuming stable revenue growth.
-9.34%
Above 1.5x SNAP's -5.96%. Michael Burry might suspect inflated intangible valuations or questionable M&A additions.
-0.83%
Less than half of SNAP's -2.44%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.33%
Less than half of SNAP's 9.58%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
5.00%
≥ 1.5x SNAP's 1.03%. David Dodd sees significantly higher long-term asset buildup. Confirm synergy with strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.51%
Below half of SNAP's -7.27%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-29.34%
1.25-1.5x SNAP's -20.72%. Martin Whitman sees potential reliance on supplier financing. Verify liquidity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.19%
Both SNAP and the company show zero Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.18%
1.1-1.25x SNAP's -7.31%. Bill Ackman questions if the firm is taking on more near-term obligations than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.94%
1.1-1.25x SNAP's -1.71%. Bill Ackman questions if the firm is incurring extra obligations vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.67%
50-75% of SNAP's -6.03%. Bruce Berkowitz notes a lower yoy liability increase.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.96%
Below half SNAP's -7.01%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-133.67%
Above 1.5x SNAP's -60.85%. Michael Burry sees a significant jump in intangible or market-based gains. Scrutinize risk of reversal.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.27%
Below half SNAP's -7.44%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
1.51%
Below half SNAP's -7.27%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-3.50%
Below half SNAP's -13.15%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
23.47%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to SNAP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
4.61%
Less than half of SNAP's 15.68%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
