743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-16.58%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-16.58% vs SNAP's -10.88%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
2.64%
Short-term investments yoy growth below half of SNAP's -9.59%. Michael Burry might see potential liquidity risk. Investigate alternative capital uses or constraints.
-2.61%
Below half of SNAP's -9.91%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
8.37%
Receivables growth 1.1-1.25x SNAP's 6.95%. Bill Ackman would demand reasons for extending more credit than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.38%
Below half of SNAP's -7.69%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
15.01%
≥ 1.5x SNAP's 1.11%. David Dodd sees more aggressive capex. Confirm it's not overspending.
0.22%
Less than half of SNAP's -0.20%. David Dodd might see less intangible risk, assuming stable revenue growth.
-7.76%
Similar yoy growth to SNAP's -7.29%. Walter Schloss sees parallel intangible investment patterns.
-0.41%
Less than half of SNAP's -1.54%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.64%
Less than half of SNAP's -15.98%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
7.04%
Below half of SNAP's -2.15%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.39%
Below half of SNAP's -5.66%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
40.81%
Less than half of SNAP's -10.90%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.37%
Higher Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth compared to SNAP's zero value, indicating better performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.96%
Above 1.5x SNAP's 2.21%. Michael Burry sees a red flag for liquidity risk vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.52%
Less than half of SNAP's 30.77%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
6.56%
Less than half of SNAP's 30.77%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.01%
1.1-1.25x SNAP's 9.01%. Bill Ackman questions if the firm is incurring more total obligations than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.39%
Below half SNAP's -6.03%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-13.10%
50-75% of SNAP's -21.16%. Bruce Berkowitz notes relatively lower AOCI expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.21%
Below half SNAP's -7.74%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
2.39%
Below half SNAP's -5.66%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
2.64%
Below half SNAP's -9.59%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-42.15%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to SNAP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
16.31%
1.25-1.5x SNAP's 10.88%. Martin Whitman is wary of heavier net leverage vs. competitor.
