743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
3.96%
Cash & equivalents yoy growth below half of SNAP's 10.49%. Michael Burry would question if the firm faces a liquidity squeeze. Check for rising debts or negative cash flow.
-1.50%
Short-term investments yoy growth below half of SNAP's -16.17%. Michael Burry might see potential liquidity risk. Investigate alternative capital uses or constraints.
-0.22%
Below half of SNAP's -9.57%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
25.24%
Receivables growth 50-75% of SNAP's 35.57%. Bruce Berkowitz would note relatively tighter receivables. Check if sales remain robust.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.71%
Below half of SNAP's -2.85%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
16.91%
Below half SNAP's -1.87%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
-0.02%
Less than half of SNAP's -0.29%. David Dodd might see less intangible risk, assuming stable revenue growth.
-10.82%
1.25-1.5x SNAP's -7.63%. Martin Whitman sees potential overreliance on intangible expansions vs. competitor.
-0.81%
50-75% of SNAP's -1.59%. Bruce Berkowitz notes lower intangible reliance than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.66%
Less than half of SNAP's -5.87%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
8.20%
Below half of SNAP's -1.93%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.28%
Below half of SNAP's -2.50%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
38.98%
50-75% of SNAP's 53.04%. Bruce Berkowitz notes the company is paying suppliers faster or not stretching terms as competitor does.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
27.83%
Higher Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth compared to SNAP's zero value, indicating better performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.47%
Above 1.5x SNAP's 2.51%. Michael Burry sees a red flag for liquidity risk vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.13%
Above 1.5x SNAP's -3.28%. Michael Burry suspects a looming risk from large additions to LT liabilities.
-6.89%
Above 1.5x SNAP's -3.28%. Michael Burry sees a strong spike vs. competitor. Check coverage and debt ratios.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.06%
Above 1.5x SNAP's 0.86%. Michael Burry sees a potential leverage warning sign.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.29%
Below half SNAP's -3.35%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
2.19%
Less than half of SNAP's -51.36%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.71%
Below half SNAP's -3.07%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
5.28%
Below half SNAP's -2.50%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-1.50%
Below half SNAP's -16.17%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
614.29%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to SNAP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
0.50%
Less than half of SNAP's -10.49%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
