743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
10.55%
Cash & equivalents growing 10.55% while SNAP's declined -36.55%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
9.88%
Short-term investments yoy growth 1.25-1.5x SNAP's 7.98%. Bruce Berkowitz might examine if there's a temporary reason for higher holdings.
10.04%
Below half of SNAP's -5.50%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-14.66%
Receivables growth 50-75% of SNAP's -20.44%. Bruce Berkowitz would note relatively tighter receivables. Check if sales remain robust.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.59%
Below half of SNAP's -8.54%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
38.12%
Below half SNAP's 125.72%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
0.17%
Less than half of SNAP's -0.44%. David Dodd might see less intangible risk, assuming stable revenue growth.
-11.13%
1.25-1.5x SNAP's -8.46%. Martin Whitman sees potential overreliance on intangible expansions vs. competitor.
-0.57%
Less than half of SNAP's -1.77%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.01%
50-75% of SNAP's 1.40%. Bruce Berkowitz notes relatively lower 'other assets' expansions.
19.90%
0.75-0.9x SNAP's 24.54%. Bill Ackman questions if the competitor invests more robustly in future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.48%
≥ 1.5x SNAP's 4.11%. David Dodd notes a larger balance sheet expansion. Confirm it's not overleveraged.
-26.34%
Less than half of SNAP's 3.08%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-100.00%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to SNAP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-100.00%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to SNAP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-3.40%
Below half of SNAP's -100.00%. Michael Burry suspects a big gap in pre-sales traction.
-100.00%
Similar yoy changes to SNAP's -100.00%. Walter Schloss finds parallel near-term liability trends.
41.20%
Above 1.5x SNAP's 10.32%. Michael Burry sees a red flag for liquidity risk vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to SNAP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
17.60%
Less than half of SNAP's -93.05%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
110.87%
50-75% of SNAP's 205.17%. Bruce Berkowitz notes a smaller yoy liability buildup than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
73.85%
1.1-1.25x SNAP's 63.69%. Bill Ackman questions if the firm is incurring more total obligations than competitor.
-100.00%
Less than half of SNAP's 7.69%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
4.25%
Below half SNAP's -5.24%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-2.76%
Less than half of SNAP's -102.16%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.84%
Below half SNAP's -6.28%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
12.48%
≥ 1.5x SNAP's 4.11%. David Dodd sees faster overall balance sheet growth than competitor.
9.88%
1.25-1.5x SNAP's 7.98%. Bruce Berkowitz checks if robust new investments are prudent.
1342.00%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to SNAP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
59.39%
Less than half of SNAP's 133.51%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
