743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-10.33%
Cash & equivalents declining -10.33% while SNAP's grows 20.99%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
-7.62%
Short-term investments yoy growth below half of SNAP's 52.35%. Michael Burry might see potential liquidity risk. Investigate alternative capital uses or constraints.
-8.56%
Below half of SNAP's 35.42%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-18.87%
Receivables growth above 1.5x SNAP's -11.90%. Michael Burry would check for potential credit bubble or inflated top-line.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.10%
Below half of SNAP's 24.84%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
5.52%
Below half SNAP's 22.02%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
3.78%
Similar yoy growth to SNAP's 3.58%. Walter Schloss sees parallel M&A strategies or intangible expansions.
43.53%
Above 1.5x SNAP's 5.28%. Michael Burry might suspect inflated intangible valuations or questionable M&A additions.
5.05%
1.25-1.5x SNAP's 3.83%. Martin Whitman worried about intangible heavy expansions vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.03%
Above 1.5x SNAP's 5.41%. Michael Burry warns of potential hidden liabilities or intangible bloat.
5.67%
0.5-0.75x SNAP's 7.56%. Martin Whitman wonders if there's insufficient reinvestment vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.07%
Below half of SNAP's 18.69%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-20.50%
Less than half of SNAP's 43.98%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to SNAP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-7.31%
Below half of SNAP's -100.00%. Michael Burry suspects a big gap in pre-sales traction.
-100.00%
Similar yoy changes to SNAP's -100.00%. Walter Schloss finds parallel near-term liability trends.
-0.23%
Less than half of SNAP's -1.06%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.00%
Less than half of SNAP's 18.90%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-0.35%
Less than half of SNAP's 56.83%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.29%
Less than half of SNAP's 43.67%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
3.05%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to SNAP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-2.94%
0.5-0.75x SNAP's -4.34%. Martin Whitman is wary of weaker retention or lower profitability.
-188.02%
Similar yoy to SNAP's -172.69%. Walter Schloss sees parallel comprehensive income changes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.32%
Below half SNAP's -5.99%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-1.07%
Below half SNAP's 18.69%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-6.27%
Below half SNAP's 52.35%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
1.30%
Less than half of SNAP's 60.22%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
69.46%
Less than half of SNAP's 182.96%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
