PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
52.05%
Net income growth above 1.5x BIDU's 29.42%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-4.56%
Negative yoy D&A while BIDU is 15.90%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
471.43%
Deferred tax of 471.43% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
31.76%
SBC growth while BIDU is negative at -24.93%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
394.44%
Slight usage while BIDU is negative at -599.31%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-314.81%
AR is negative yoy while BIDU is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
4392.31%
Inventory growth of 4392.31% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1500.00%
Some yoy usage while BIDU is negative at -954.29%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
966.67%
Well above BIDU's 252.46%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
83.87%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x BIDU's 46.65%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
18.04%
Some CapEx rise while BIDU is negative at -17.12%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-23.23%
Both yoy lines negative, with BIDU at -525.55%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
-29.51%
Negative yoy purchasing while BIDU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
15.29%
Liquidation growth of 15.29% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-133.33%
We reduce yoy other investing while BIDU is 95.84%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-52.76%
We reduce yoy invests while BIDU stands at 47.51%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
16.51%
We repay more while BIDU is negative at -1.67%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
62.22%
Buyback growth of 62.22% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.