PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
40.43%
Net income growth at 75-90% of BIDU's 49.51%. Bill Ackman would call for strategic or operational tweaks to match competitor’s earnings growth.
0.44%
Some D&A expansion while BIDU is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
70.40%
Deferred tax of 70.40% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
9.94%
Less SBC growth vs. BIDU's 21.87%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-98.43%
Negative yoy working capital usage while BIDU is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-435.71%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with BIDU at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
34.36%
Inventory growth of 34.36% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
306.67%
AP growth of 306.67% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
37.84%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. BIDU's 100.00%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-83.33%
Both negative yoy, with BIDU at -346.01%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
10.59%
Some CFO growth while BIDU is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-9.36%
Negative yoy CapEx while BIDU is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
90.27%
Acquisition spending well above BIDU's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
18.00%
Purchases growth of 18.00% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
163.36%
Liquidation growth of 163.36% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-8.70%
We reduce yoy other investing while BIDU is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
80.17%
Investing outflow well above BIDU's 100.00%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
21.28%
Debt repayment well below BIDU's 100.00%. Michael Burry suspects heavier leverage risk or insufficient cash generation to keep pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.