PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
36.09%
Net income growth above 1.5x BIDU's 21.49%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
5.98%
Some D&A expansion while BIDU is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-18.46%
Negative yoy deferred tax while BIDU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
7.76%
Less SBC growth vs. BIDU's 29.73%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-177.88%
Both reduce yoy usage, with BIDU at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-284.27%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with BIDU at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
909.76%
Inventory growth of 909.76% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-2150.00%
Negative yoy AP while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
930.23%
Some yoy usage while BIDU is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-53.85%
Both negative yoy, with BIDU at -701.02%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
7.21%
Some CFO growth while BIDU is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
12.10%
Lower CapEx growth vs. BIDU's 100.00%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
-1800.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while BIDU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-108.22%
Negative yoy purchasing while BIDU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-1.53%
We reduce yoy sales while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
24.24%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. BIDU's 100.00%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-196.60%
We reduce yoy invests while BIDU stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
Debt repayment similar to BIDU's 100.00%. Walter Schloss sees parallel liability management or similar free cash flow availability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.