PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
27.09%
Net income growth under 50% of BIDU's 148.45%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
8.49%
D&A growth well above BIDU's 5.87%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
130.95%
Deferred tax of 130.95% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
19.03%
SBC growth well above BIDU's 26.15%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-161.31%
Both reduce yoy usage, with BIDU at -146.02%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-163.38%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with BIDU at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
248.15%
Inventory growth of 248.15% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-180.00%
Negative yoy AP while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
234.38%
Some yoy usage while BIDU is negative at -342.72%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
60.00%
Well above BIDU's 81.57%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
5.97%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of BIDU's 59.38%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-13.61%
Negative yoy CapEx while BIDU is 3.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.19%
Negative yoy purchasing while BIDU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
32.78%
Liquidation growth of 32.78% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
100.00%
Growth well above BIDU's 15.89%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
7.66%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. BIDU's 16.90%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.21%
We have some buyback growth while BIDU is negative at -26.46%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.