PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
20.88%
Net income growth under 50% of BIDU's 80.02%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
6.18%
Less D&A growth vs. BIDU's 27.15%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-461.54%
Negative yoy deferred tax while BIDU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-2.13%
Negative yoy SBC while BIDU is 5.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
16.16%
Less working capital growth vs. BIDU's 1021.50%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-18.65%
AR is negative yoy while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
70.00%
Inventory growth of 70.00% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
210.71%
AP growth of 210.71% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
76.74%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. BIDU's 274.92%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-12.50%
Both negative yoy, with BIDU at -2098.32%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
14.33%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of BIDU's 44.78%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-21.54%
Both yoy lines negative, with BIDU at -308.09%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-1125.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while BIDU stands at 3278.62%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
12.20%
Purchases growth of 12.20% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
39.74%
Liquidation growth of 39.74% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
40.91%
Growth well above BIDU's 68.86%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
31.73%
We have mild expansions while BIDU is negative at -26.87%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-326.67%
We cut yoy buybacks while BIDU is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.