PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-9.33%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with BIDU at -47.67%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
10.35%
Some D&A expansion while BIDU is negative at -25.97%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-139.36%
Negative yoy deferred tax while BIDU stands at 9.74%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-19.41%
Negative yoy SBC while BIDU is 16.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
810.91%
Slight usage while BIDU is negative at -30.33%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-200.00%
AR is negative yoy while BIDU is 7.62%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
2316.18%
Inventory growth well above BIDU's 342.45%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
61.29%
A yoy AP increase while BIDU is negative at -50.35%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
2057.24%
Some yoy usage while BIDU is negative at -68.25%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-28.57%
Negative yoy while BIDU is 100.20%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
25.16%
Some CFO growth while BIDU is negative at -9.45%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-28.89%
Negative yoy CapEx while BIDU is 53.47%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
82.65%
Some acquisitions while BIDU is negative at -94.08%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
15.96%
Purchases well above BIDU's 12.81%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-41.68%
Both yoy lines are negative, with BIDU at -1.52%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-90.32%
Both yoy lines negative, with BIDU at -78.13%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-34.44%
We reduce yoy invests while BIDU stands at 34.03%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-49.69%
We cut yoy buybacks while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.