PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
16.87%
Net income growth under 50% of BIDU's 60.95%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
11.25%
Some D&A expansion while BIDU is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
79.11%
Well above BIDU's 100.00% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
17.32%
SBC growth while BIDU is negative at -20.29%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-48.49%
Both reduce yoy usage, with BIDU at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
157.35%
AR growth well above BIDU's 100.00%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-93.21%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with BIDU at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-98.00%
Both negative yoy AP, with BIDU at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-93.35%
Both reduce yoy usage, with BIDU at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
60.00%
Some yoy increase while BIDU is negative at -83122.22%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
2.48%
Some CFO growth while BIDU is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-24.31%
Negative yoy CapEx while BIDU is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-188.24%
Both yoy lines negative, with BIDU at -100.00%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
23.71%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. BIDU's 100.00%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
119.06%
We have some liquidation growth while BIDU is negative at -100.00%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-133.33%
We reduce yoy other investing while BIDU is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
74.22%
Investing outflow well above BIDU's 100.00%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-85.18%
We cut yoy buybacks while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.