PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-64.71%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with BIDU at -157.57%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
10.61%
Some D&A expansion while BIDU is negative at -66.24%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-8.96%
Negative yoy deferred tax while BIDU stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
4.02%
SBC growth while BIDU is negative at -21.66%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
374.43%
Slight usage while BIDU is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
168.41%
AR growth well above BIDU's 100.00%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
2653.37%
Inventory growth well above BIDU's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-172.18%
Both negative yoy AP, with BIDU at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
2411.03%
Growth well above BIDU's 100.00%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
131.58%
Some yoy increase while BIDU is negative at -25.12%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
21.13%
Some CFO growth while BIDU is negative at -81.41%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
12.12%
Lower CapEx growth vs. BIDU's 57.55%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
63.50%
Some acquisitions while BIDU is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-230.65%
Negative yoy purchasing while BIDU stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
41.25%
We have some liquidation growth while BIDU is negative at -100.00%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-138.10%
Both yoy lines negative, with BIDU at -150.47%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-80.53%
We reduce yoy invests while BIDU stands at 59.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
82.49%
Buyback growth at 75-90% of BIDU's 100.00%. Bill Ackman would call for more share repurchases if undervaluation is evident, to match competitor’s approach.