PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
132.84%
Some net income increase while BIDU is negative at -364.22%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-5.73%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with BIDU at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
17400.00%
Deferred tax of 17400.00% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-4.14%
Both cut yoy SBC, with BIDU at -25.12%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-89.13%
Negative yoy working capital usage while BIDU is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
67.40%
AR growth well above BIDU's 100.00%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-62.72%
Negative yoy inventory while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
1012.50%
AP growth of 1012.50% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-86.01%
Negative yoy usage while BIDU is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
233.33%
Well above BIDU's 233.27%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
8.03%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of BIDU's 26.36%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
2.78%
Lower CapEx growth vs. BIDU's 100.00%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
-233.33%
Negative yoy acquisition while BIDU stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-43.58%
Negative yoy purchasing while BIDU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
21.70%
Liquidation growth of 21.70% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
84.38%
We have some outflow growth while BIDU is negative at -22.12%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-25.94%
Both yoy lines negative, with BIDU at -22.12%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-1.41%
We cut debt repayment yoy while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.26%
We cut yoy buybacks while BIDU is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.