PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.45%
Some net income increase while BIDU is negative at -102.27%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
0.66%
D&A growth of 0.66% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
-45.22%
Negative yoy deferred tax while BIDU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
39.23%
SBC growth well above BIDU's 41.16%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-34.07%
Negative yoy working capital usage while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-260.90%
AR is negative yoy while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
68.12%
Inventory growth of 68.12% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
146.40%
AP growth of 146.40% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
68.18%
Growth of 68.18% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
68.18%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. BIDU's 139.56%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
8.20%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of BIDU's 92.76%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-7.96%
Negative yoy CapEx while BIDU is 108.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-65.25%
Negative yoy purchasing while BIDU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
24.92%
Liquidation growth of 24.92% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-2950.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with BIDU at -65.31%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-68.14%
Both yoy lines negative, with BIDU at -65.31%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
18.54%
Debt repayment growth of 18.54% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-79.72%
We cut yoy buybacks while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.