PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-27.42%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with BIDU at -151.60%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
7.05%
Some D&A expansion while BIDU is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-175.27%
Negative yoy deferred tax while BIDU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
3.82%
SBC growth while BIDU is negative at -36.79%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
4.74%
Less working capital growth vs. BIDU's 100.00%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
225.47%
AR growth well above BIDU's 100.00%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-69.61%
Negative yoy inventory while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-200.68%
Negative yoy AP while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-101.38%
Negative yoy usage while BIDU is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-750.00%
Both negative yoy, with BIDU at -8.07%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-22.25%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with BIDU at -60.29%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-1.32%
Negative yoy CapEx while BIDU is 53.29%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-63.10%
Negative yoy acquisition while BIDU stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
33.23%
Purchases growth of 33.23% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-69.52%
We reduce yoy sales while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
194.31%
We have some outflow growth while BIDU is negative at -244.16%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-181.99%
Both yoy lines negative, with BIDU at -244.16%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-35.47%
We cut debt repayment yoy while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
52.61%
Buyback growth at 50-75% of BIDU's 100.00%. Martin Whitman questions partial disadvantage in per-share enhancements if competitor repurchases more.