PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
22.72%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 17.61%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify whether cost discipline or revenue gains drive the outperformance.
6.23%
Some D&A expansion while BIDU is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
47.14%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. BIDU's 100.00%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
1.43%
SBC growth while BIDU is negative at -24.55%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
33.21%
Less working capital growth vs. BIDU's 100.00%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
249.94%
AR growth well above BIDU's 100.00%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-226.03%
Negative yoy AP while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-58.98%
Negative yoy usage while BIDU is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-79.48%
Both negative yoy, with BIDU at -147.38%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-3.54%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with BIDU at -25.63%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
24.34%
CapEx growth well above BIDU's 32.87%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-616.13%
Negative yoy acquisition while BIDU stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
88.53%
Purchases growth of 88.53% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-76.40%
We reduce yoy sales while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
80.77%
We have some outflow growth while BIDU is negative at -827.63%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
10.46%
We have mild expansions while BIDU is negative at -513.36%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-12.34%
We cut debt repayment yoy while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-36.46%
We cut yoy buybacks while BIDU is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.