PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
36.42%
Some net income increase while BIDU is negative at -10.56%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
3.92%
D&A growth of 3.92% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
-83.39%
Negative yoy deferred tax while BIDU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
33.07%
SBC growth well above BIDU's 47.08%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
37.34%
Working capital change of 37.34% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
-155.93%
AR is negative yoy while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
95.38%
AP growth of 95.38% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
343.40%
Growth of 343.40% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
-41.81%
Negative yoy while BIDU is 345.92%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
23.65%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of BIDU's 82.05%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
9.15%
Some CapEx rise while BIDU is negative at -108.96%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
81.31%
Acquisition growth of 81.31% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-743.53%
Negative yoy purchasing while BIDU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
240.07%
Liquidation growth of 240.07% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-103.19%
We reduce yoy other investing while BIDU is 130.60%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
22.84%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. BIDU's 121.10%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
16.67%
Debt repayment growth of 16.67% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
90.41%
Buyback growth of 90.41% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.