PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
48.73%
Net income growth above 1.5x BIDU's 28.23%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
9.00%
D&A growth of 9.00% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
368.16%
Deferred tax of 368.16% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-13.99%
Both cut yoy SBC, with BIDU at -37.59%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-128.18%
Negative yoy working capital usage while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
52.39%
AR growth of 52.39% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1300.00%
AP growth of 1300.00% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-118.56%
Negative yoy usage while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-6.76%
Both negative yoy, with BIDU at -53.57%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
17.87%
Some CFO growth while BIDU is negative at -10.41%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-5.26%
Both yoy lines negative, with BIDU at -30.41%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
54.22%
Acquisition growth of 54.22% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-40.45%
Negative yoy purchasing while BIDU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-18.83%
We reduce yoy sales while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
1333.33%
We have some outflow growth while BIDU is negative at -182.04%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-16.80%
Both yoy lines negative, with BIDU at -265.51%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-21.36%
We cut debt repayment yoy while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-297.44%
We cut yoy buybacks while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.