PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
21.01%
Some net income increase while BIDU is negative at -61.10%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
10.95%
D&A growth of 10.95% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
-138.08%
Negative yoy deferred tax while BIDU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-1.95%
Negative yoy SBC while BIDU is 28.47%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-27.74%
Negative yoy working capital usage while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-319.32%
AR is negative yoy while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.94%
Negative yoy AP while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
341.98%
Growth of 341.98% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
195.41%
Well above BIDU's 271.51%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-4.89%
Negative yoy CFO while BIDU is 11.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-17.15%
Both yoy lines negative, with BIDU at -3.71%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-68.42%
Negative yoy acquisition while BIDU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-16.39%
Negative yoy purchasing while BIDU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
60.04%
Liquidation growth of 60.04% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
89.19%
We have some outflow growth while BIDU is negative at -20.20%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-6.50%
Both yoy lines negative, with BIDU at -16.11%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-14.98%
We cut debt repayment yoy while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-66.49%
We cut yoy buybacks while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.