PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-20.13%
Negative net income growth while BIDU stands at 48.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-12.56%
Negative yoy D&A while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
25.45%
Deferred tax of 25.45% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-2.70%
Both cut yoy SBC, with BIDU at -30.78%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
100.00%
Working capital change of 100.00% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
194.16%
AR growth of 194.16% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-282.04%
Negative yoy AP while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-100.00%
Negative yoy usage while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
24.24%
Some yoy increase while BIDU is negative at -318.75%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-14.16%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with BIDU at -354.71%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
10.29%
Some CapEx rise while BIDU is negative at -24.30%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.94%
Negative yoy purchasing while BIDU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
25.33%
Liquidation growth of 25.33% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-1225.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while BIDU is 151.30%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
6.92%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. BIDU's 78.62%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
-82.73%
We cut debt repayment yoy while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.