PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-5.42%
Negative net income growth while GOOG stands at 8.94%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
34.72%
D&A growth well above GOOG's 8.13%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-87.13%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
9.38%
Less SBC growth vs. GOOG's 31.26%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
178.81%
Less working capital growth vs. GOOG's 388.52%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
20.00%
AR growth while GOOG is negative at -8.78%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
183.57%
Some inventory rise while GOOG is negative at -89.52%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
190.00%
A yoy AP increase while GOOG is negative at -110.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
205.24%
Growth well above GOOG's 381.48%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
82.33%
Some yoy increase while GOOG is negative at -900.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
337.98%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x GOOG's 12.25%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-3.03%
Negative yoy CapEx while GOOG is 25.85%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
66.67%
Acquisition spending well above GOOG's 31.75%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
55.04%
Some yoy expansion while GOOG is negative at -63.17%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
300.00%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. GOOG's 1863.16%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
60.88%
Investing outflow well above GOOG's 47.88%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
13.21%
Debt repayment well below GOOG's 84.60%. Michael Burry suspects heavier leverage risk or insufficient cash generation to keep pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.