PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
33.04%
Some net income increase while GOOG is negative at -0.88%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
6.19%
D&A growth well above GOOG's 2.24%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
62.86%
Some yoy growth while GOOG is negative at -395.16%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
8.57%
SBC growth while GOOG is negative at -6.13%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-98.92%
Negative yoy working capital usage while GOOG is 56.25%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-131.82%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with GOOG at -307.62%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-100.00%
Negative yoy inventory while GOOG is 2454.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-203.45%
Negative yoy AP while GOOG is 680.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-33.33%
Negative yoy usage while GOOG is 42.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
40.00%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. GOOG's 210.00%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-9.73%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with GOOG at -0.66%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-36.03%
Both yoy lines negative, with GOOG at -39.85%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-1800.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with GOOG at -12.70%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
66.63%
Purchases well above GOOG's 21.11%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
140.00%
We have some liquidation growth while GOOG is negative at -17.66%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-87.50%
Both yoy lines negative, with GOOG at -193.66%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
94.59%
We have mild expansions while GOOG is negative at -32.26%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-15.22%
Both yoy lines negative, with GOOG at -183.33%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.