PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-32.12%
Negative net income growth while GOOG stands at 6.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
6.80%
D&A growth well above GOOG's 1.59%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-5.26%
Negative yoy deferred tax while GOOG stands at 293.44%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
35.53%
SBC growth well above GOOG's 3.73%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
1000.00%
Slight usage while GOOG is negative at -289.45%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
163.73%
AR growth well above GOOG's 133.11%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
90.00%
Lower AP growth vs. GOOG's 482.76%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
-129.85%
Both reduce yoy usage, with GOOG at -66.24%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-76.67%
Both negative yoy, with GOOG at -209.09%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-13.53%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with GOOG at -5.86%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-144.86%
Negative yoy CapEx while GOOG is 36.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-31.58%
Negative yoy acquisition while GOOG stands at 83.27%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-208.80%
Negative yoy purchasing while GOOG stands at 51.29%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
43.24%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x GOOG's 8.46%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
-200.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while GOOG is 123.38%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-1574.42%
We reduce yoy invests while GOOG stands at 278.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-33.96%
We cut debt repayment yoy while GOOG is 10.59%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.