PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
1.90%
Some net income increase while GOOG is negative at -17.80%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
12.45%
Less D&A growth vs. GOOG's 43.37%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
112.12%
Some yoy growth while GOOG is negative at -27.66%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
12.42%
Less SBC growth vs. GOOG's 40.98%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-650.00%
Negative yoy working capital usage while GOOG is 23.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
2.67%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. GOOG's 95.01%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
-58.91%
Negative yoy inventory while GOOG is 533.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-172.15%
Negative yoy AP while GOOG is 22.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-71.53%
Both reduce yoy usage, with GOOG at -38.33%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
75.00%
Well above GOOG's 31.64%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-6.94%
Negative yoy CFO while GOOG is 6.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-2.77%
Negative yoy CapEx while GOOG is 8.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-3768.42%
Both yoy lines negative, with GOOG at -110.31%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
-14.92%
Both yoy lines negative, with GOOG at -45.76%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
284.45%
We have some liquidation growth while GOOG is negative at -8.13%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-5500.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with GOOG at -66.17%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
810.19%
We have mild expansions while GOOG is negative at -690.42%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
25.76%
Debt repayment similar to GOOG's 25.87%. Walter Schloss sees parallel liability management or similar free cash flow availability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.