PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-13.03%
Negative net income growth while GOOG stands at 69.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
49.83%
Some D&A expansion while GOOG is negative at -18.10%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-4600.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while GOOG stands at 209.44%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
139.38%
SBC growth while GOOG is negative at -7.98%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-7.58%
Both reduce yoy usage, with GOOG at -141.45%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-90.11%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with GOOG at -3097.22%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
101.89%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. GOOG's 1834.62%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
133.33%
Lower AP growth vs. GOOG's 532.28%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
178.05%
Some yoy usage while GOOG is negative at -125.26%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
50.00%
Some yoy increase while GOOG is negative at -642.98%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
26.84%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x GOOG's 6.17%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-7.26%
Both yoy lines negative, with GOOG at -46.92%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-474.29%
Negative yoy acquisition while GOOG stands at 111.38%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-66.71%
Negative yoy purchasing while GOOG stands at 27.55%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-79.44%
We reduce yoy sales while GOOG is 12.42%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-109.82%
Both yoy lines negative, with GOOG at -298.10%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-320.75%
We reduce yoy invests while GOOG stands at 65.25%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
10.20%
Debt repayment at 50-75% of GOOG's 14.42%. Martin Whitman would worry about partial lag if competitor gains advantage from lower debt burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.