PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
40.43%
Net income growth above 1.5x GOOG's 9.62%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
0.44%
Less D&A growth vs. GOOG's 4.84%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
70.40%
Some yoy growth while GOOG is negative at -411.27%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
9.94%
SBC growth while GOOG is negative at -5.90%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-98.43%
Negative yoy working capital usage while GOOG is 55.92%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-435.71%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with GOOG at -209.89%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
34.36%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. GOOG's 223.33%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
306.67%
A yoy AP increase while GOOG is negative at -1458.33%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
37.84%
Growth well above GOOG's 64.71%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-83.33%
Both negative yoy, with GOOG at -39.29%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
10.59%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x GOOG's 5.56%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-9.36%
Negative yoy CapEx while GOOG is 14.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
90.27%
Some acquisitions while GOOG is negative at -21.88%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
18.00%
Some yoy expansion while GOOG is negative at -53.63%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
163.36%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x GOOG's 66.65%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
-8.70%
We reduce yoy other investing while GOOG is 192.50%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
80.17%
Investing outflow well above GOOG's 30.13%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
21.28%
We repay more while GOOG is negative at -2.66%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.