PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
24.62%
Net income growth above 1.5x GOOG's 1.22%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
5.88%
D&A growth well above GOOG's 1.13%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-480.30%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-0.79%
Negative yoy SBC while GOOG is 26.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
10650.00%
Slight usage while GOOG is negative at -114.56%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
26.60%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. GOOG's 65.19%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
146.95%
Some inventory rise while GOOG is negative at -17.43%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-129.03%
Negative yoy AP while GOOG is 161.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
153.33%
Some yoy usage while GOOG is negative at -176.48%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
500.00%
Some yoy increase while GOOG is negative at -151.28%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
16.60%
Some CFO growth while GOOG is negative at -14.00%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-42.08%
Negative yoy CapEx while GOOG is 5.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-8.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with GOOG at -30.77%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
-90.54%
Both yoy lines negative, with GOOG at -11.79%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-9.90%
We reduce yoy sales while GOOG is 12.08%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
57.14%
We have some outflow growth while GOOG is negative at -44.79%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-485.11%
Both yoy lines negative, with GOOG at -13.99%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
37.84%
We repay more while GOOG is negative at -7.10%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.