743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
49.98%
Net income growth above 1.5x GOOG's 5.37%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
3.89%
D&A growth well above GOOG's 5.70%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-1447.37%
Negative yoy deferred tax while GOOG stands at 35.92%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
1.47%
SBC growth while GOOG is negative at -0.75%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
170.64%
Slight usage while GOOG is negative at -64.81%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-299.60%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with GOOG at -708.16%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
56300.00%
Inventory growth well above GOOG's 93.04%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
94.44%
A yoy AP increase while GOOG is negative at -127.89%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
57200.00%
Growth well above GOOG's 125.20%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
75.00%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. GOOG's 300.00%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
37.82%
Some CFO growth while GOOG is negative at -4.39%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-15.89%
Both yoy lines negative, with GOOG at -20.52%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
32.79%
Some acquisitions while GOOG is negative at -162.70%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
35.68%
Purchases well above GOOG's 45.81%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-24.88%
Both yoy lines are negative, with GOOG at -24.98%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-362.50%
We reduce yoy other investing while GOOG is 100.75%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
36.64%
Investing outflow well above GOOG's 63.96%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while GOOG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.