743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
132.84%
Some net income increase while GOOG is negative at -28.94%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-5.73%
Negative yoy D&A while GOOG is 3.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
17400.00%
Some yoy growth while GOOG is negative at -134.49%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-4.14%
Both cut yoy SBC, with GOOG at -4.79%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-89.13%
Negative yoy working capital usage while GOOG is 328.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
67.40%
AR growth well above GOOG's 99.91%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-62.72%
Negative yoy inventory while GOOG is 1.62%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
1012.50%
AP growth well above GOOG's 416.67%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-86.01%
Negative yoy usage while GOOG is 111.98%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
233.33%
Well above GOOG's 149.11%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
8.03%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of GOOG's 22.48%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
2.78%
Some CapEx rise while GOOG is negative at -9.89%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-233.33%
Negative yoy acquisition while GOOG stands at 14.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-43.58%
Both yoy lines negative, with GOOG at -52.52%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
21.70%
Below 50% of GOOG's 72.70%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
84.38%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. GOOG's 589.09%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-25.94%
We reduce yoy invests while GOOG stands at 14.44%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-1.41%
Both yoy lines negative, with GOOG at -215.22%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.26%
Both yoy lines negative, with GOOG at -59.24%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.