PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.45%
Net income growth above 1.5x GOOG's 3.32%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
0.66%
Less D&A growth vs. GOOG's 6.97%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-45.22%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
39.23%
SBC growth well above GOOG's 1.55%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-34.07%
Negative yoy working capital usage while GOOG is 29.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-260.90%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with GOOG at -231.03%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
68.12%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. GOOG's 200.96%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
146.40%
AP growth well above GOOG's 86.76%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
68.18%
Some yoy usage while GOOG is negative at -217.68%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
68.18%
Well above GOOG's 42.25%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
8.20%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of GOOG's 13.48%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
-7.96%
Negative yoy CapEx while GOOG is 7.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-65.25%
Negative yoy purchasing while GOOG stands at 32.70%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
24.92%
We have some liquidation growth while GOOG is negative at -44.85%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-2950.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with GOOG at -23.33%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-68.14%
Both yoy lines negative, with GOOG at -68.57%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
18.54%
We repay more while GOOG is negative at -726.15%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-79.72%
Both yoy lines negative, with GOOG at -12.29%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.